RUFFIN v. FITZPATRICK et al, No. 1:2014cv00453 - Document 44 (D. Me. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMINJG THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 39 Report and Recommendations, granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment, and entering judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's remaining claims. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
RUFFIN v. FITZPATRICK et al Doc. 44 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN FITZPATRICK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:14-CV-00453-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on May 25, 2016, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 39). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 42) on July 1, 2016. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com 2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff’s remaining claims. /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 11th day of July, 2016.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
