BRACKETT et al v. THICKE, No. 1:2014cv00252 - Document 6 (D. Me. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 4 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (nwd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE NATHAN BRACKETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBIN THICKE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-252-JDL ) ) ) ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 4) with the court on August 4, 2014, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636 (b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The time within which to file objections expired on August 25, 2014, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified plaintiff David Rothrock that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. The court s mailings to plaintiff Nathan Brackett, at the address listed in the complaint, 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104, were returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable on July 24 and August 19, 2014. See ECF No. 3 and 5. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2014 /s/Jon D.Levy___________ United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
