MACHIAVELLI v. BARNHART, No. 1:2012cv00200 - Document 19 (D. Me. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 16 Report and Recommendations. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0.; denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine ANTHONY T.C. MACHIAVELLI, Plaintiff v. PATRICIA BARNHART, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:12-cv-00200-GZS ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 17, 2012, her Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 18) on November 1, 2012. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. 3. It is also hereby ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue in the event Plaintiff files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2). /s/George Z. Singal_____________ U.S. District Judge Dated this 5th day of November 2012.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.