RICHARDS v. CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE, No. 1:2011cv00446 - Document 23 (D. Me. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 19 Report and Recommendations for 7 Motion to Dismiss filed by CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ADELINE E. RICHARDS, PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE, DEFENDANT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-446-DBH ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On May 25, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, her Recommended Decision on Motion to Dismiss. The defendant filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on June 11, 2012. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. DENIED IN The motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND PART as follows: Counts I and IV are DISMISSED as time-barred. The motion to dismiss is DENIED as to all the federal counts. The motion to strike is DENIED. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2012 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
