MEGGISON v. MAINE, STATE OF, No. 1:2009cv00414 - Document 9 (D. Me. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 7 Report and Recommendations, 1 Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TRACY MEGGISON No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22b-First Circuit Local rule 22.1; denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jlg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE TRACY MEGGISON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MAINE, STATE OF Defendants. Civil No. 09-414-B-W ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 22, 2009 her Recommended Decision. The Plaintiff filed his objections to the Recommended Decision on October 29, 2009. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge s Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge s Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. 1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. 2. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition (Docket #1) be and herby is DENIED. 3. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) . SO ORDERED. /s/John A. Woodcock, Jr.__________ JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 30th day of October, 2009
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
