Davis v. Coastal Bridge Company et al, No. 3:2012cv00309 - Document 5 (M.D. La. 2012)

Court Description: OPINION: After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which no objection was filed: The Court finds that the plaintiff's complaint is sua sponte dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) as frivolous, and plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is therefore dismissed as moot. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 8/14/12. (DCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHARLOTTE R. DAVIS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 12-309-FJP-DLD COASTAL BRIDGE COMPANY, ET AL O P I N I O N After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report1 to which no objection was filed: The Court finds that the plaintiff's complaint is sua sponte dismissed under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e) as frivolous, and plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis2 is therefore dismissed as moot. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August 14, 2012. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. No. 4. 2 Rec. Doc. No. 2. Doc#47961

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.