Williams v. Angrum et al, No. 3:2011cv00287 - Document 19 (M.D. La. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge...The Court finds that the defendants' motion for summary judgment 18 is denied. The Court further finds that plaintiff's claims against Lt. Bradley, MSgt. Canon and Sgt. Davis aredismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This action is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 07/16/2012. (KDC)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CORDERRAL WILLIAMS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-287-FJP-SCR LT. V. ANGRUM, ET AL O P I N I O N After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report1 to which no objection was filed: The Court finds that the defendants' motion for summary judgment2 is denied. claims against Lt. The Court further finds that plaintiff's Bradley, MSgt. Canon and Sgt. Davis are dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This action is hereby referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 16, 2012. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 1 Rec. Doc. No. 18. 2 Rec. Doc. No. 16. Doc#47935
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
