Williams v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al, No. 2:2017cv04633 - Document 55 (E.D. La. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that Defendants' 48 Daubert motion to exclude Cook is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 49 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Williams's claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 8/30/2022. (clc)

Download PDF
Williams v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al Doc. 55 Case 2:17-cv-04633-BWA-KWR Document 55 Filed 08/30/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA AURON RAYNARD WILLIAMS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-4633 BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC., et al. SECTION M (4) ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a Daubert motion in limine to exclude the general causation opinions of plaintiff’s medical expert Dr. Jerald Cook filed by defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff Auron Raynard Williams responds in opposition.2 Also before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in which they argue that the case should be dismissed because Williams cannot prove general causation without Cook’s opinions.3 Williams responds in opposition.4 Defendants’ motions here are nearly identical to those filed by Defendants, and granted by this Court, in other B3 cases.5 See, e.g., Carpenter v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., 2022 WL 2757416 (E.D. La. July 14, 2022); Johns v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811088 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Johnson v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811090 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Macon v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811135 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Murray v. BP Expl. & Prod. 1 R. Doc. 48. R. Doc. 52. 3 R. Doc. 49. 4 R. Doc. 51. 5 Dr. Cook updated his report on June 21, 2022. R. Doc. 48-3. The Court has reviewed the new report and concludes that it does not cure the previously identified deficiencies in Cook’s prior reports; specifically, the June 21 report does not provide admissible general causation opinions. Id. 2 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:17-cv-04633-BWA-KWR Document 55 Filed 08/30/22 Page 2 of 2 Inc., 2022 WL 1811138 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Street v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811144 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022). Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in those cases, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Daubert motion to exclude Cook (R. Doc. 48) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 49) is GRANTED, and Williams’s claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 30th day of August, 2022. ________________________________ BARRY W. ASHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.