Prest v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al, No. 2:2017cv03409 - Document 49 (E.D. La. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS: granting 40 Motion to Exclude, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 10/18/2022. (am)

Download PDF
Prest v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al Doc. 49 Case 2:17-cv-03409-BWA-KWR Document 49 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KIRK PREST CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-3409 BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC., et al. SECTION M (4) ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a Daubert motion in limine to exclude the general causation opinions of plaintiff’s medical expert Dr. Jerald Cook filed by defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff Kirk Prest responds in opposition.2 Defendants’ motion here is nearly identical to the Daubert motions regarding Cook filed by Defendants, and granted by this Court, in other B3 cases.3 See, e.g., Carpenter v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., 2022 WL 2757416 (E.D. La. July 14, 2022); Johns v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811088 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Johnson v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811090 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Macon v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811135 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Murray v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811138 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Street v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811144 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022). 1 R. Doc. 40. R. Doc. 44. 3 Dr. Cook updated his report on September 30, 2022. R. Doc. 40-5. The Court has reviewed the new report and concludes that it does not cure the previously identified deficiencies in Cook’s prior reports; specifically, the September 30 report does not provide admissible general causation opinions. Id. Prest admits in his opposition memorandum that applying the Court’s prior reasoning in similar motions to this one would lead to the same result, namely, exclusion of Cook’s opinions. R. Doc. 44 at 6. Prest advocates for a different approach that ignores Fifth Circuit toxic tort precedent and blames Defendants for the lack of dose-response data. Id. at 6-25. The Court is not persuaded by these arguments. 2 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:17-cv-03409-BWA-KWR Document 49 Filed 10/18/22 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in those cases, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Daubert motion to exclude Cook (R. Doc. 40) is GRANTED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 18th day of October, 2022. ________________________________ BARRY W. ASHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.