Moran v. Connick et al, No. 2:2011cv02240 - Document 30 (E.D. La. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER and REASONS - It appears to the Court that Plaintiff's "Second Amended Complaint" 24 was filed into the record without leave of court being granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the document be stricken from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff desires to amend his complaint to include additional allegations, he must submit, no later than ten (10) days from entry of this order, a motion for leave to file a second amending and superseding complaint accom panied by a proposed "Second Amending and Superseding Complaint" that also includes the allegations of the original and first amended complaints on which Plaintiff continues to rely. Because the proposed pleading accompanying Plaintiff's pending motion for leave to file 22 does not comply with the requirements set forth in this order, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/6/2012.(cab)

Download PDF
Moran v. Connick et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOHN A. MORAN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-2240 HARRY CONNICK, SR, ET AL. SECTION “N” (1) ORDER AND REASONS It appears to the Court that Plaintiff’s “Second Amended Complaint” (Rec. Doc. 24) was filed into the record without leave of court being granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the document be stricken from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff desires to amend his complaint to include additional allegations, he must submit, no later than ten (10) days from entry of this order, a motion for leave to file a second amending and superseding complaint accompanied by a proposed “Second Amending and Superseding Complaint” that also includes the allegations of the original and first amended complaints on which Plaintiff continues to rely. Because the proposed pleading accompanying Plaintiff’s pending motion for leave to file (Rec. Doc. 22) does not comply with the requirements set forth in this order, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of June 2012. ___________________________________ Kurt D. Engelhardt United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.