Allo et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, No. 2:2009cv06524 - Document 16 (E.D. La. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER & REASONS that plaintiffs' claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 5/25/2010.(lag, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allo et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DARRELL ALLO, JR., ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 09-6524 STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY SECTION “B”(4) ORDER AND REASONS After failing to respond to the rule to show cause of this court, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs, Darrell Allo, Jr. and Starlet P. Allo’s claims are hereby DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Plaintiffs failed to comply with the court order requiring them to submit to the court a status report (Record Document No. 6). Per Order dated April 12, 2010 Plaintiffs, Darrell Allo, Jr. and Starlet P. Allo were ordered to show cause in writing no later than April 29, 2010 why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or timely comply with court orders (Record Document Nos. 6 and 11). Plaintiffs were warned that failure to timely comply with orders of the Court may result in dismissal of their case for failure to prosecute without further notice. record in this matter indicates that the A review of the order was send to Plaintiffs and has not been returned as undeliverable. Dockets.Justia.com While we construe pro se pleadings liberally, pro se litigants, like all other parties, must abide by procedural rules. e.g., United States v. Wilkes, 20 F. 3d 651, 653 (5th Cir. 1994). Pro se litigants under law are responsible for their actions and inactions to the same extent as represented parties. Birl v. Estelle, 660 F.2d 592, 593 (5th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, due to Plaintiffs Darrell Allo, Jr. and Starlet P. Allo’s failing to respond to court’s directive, IT IS ORDERED that their claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 for failure to prosecute their claims. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 25th day of May, 2010. _____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
