Carpenter v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, No. 2:2009cv00561 - Document 22 (E.D. La. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS denying 17 Motion to Strike the Testimony and Untimely Report of Plaintiff's Proposed Expert, Don Kotter. Signed by Judge A. J. McNamara on 4/7/2010. (caa, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carpenter v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BONNIE CARPENTER * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO: 09-561 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY * SECTION: "D"(2) ORDER AND REASONS Before the court is the “Motion to Strike the Testimony and Untimely Report of Plaintiff’s Proposed Expert, Don Kotter” (Doc. No. 17) filed by Defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. Plaintiff, Bonnie Carpenter, filed a memorandum in opposition. The motion, set for hearing on Wednesday, April 7, 2010, is before the court on briefs, without oral argument. Now, having considered the memoranda of counsel, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that the motion should be denied. The deadline for Plaintiff’s expert report was originally February 25, 2010, and upon Plaintiff’s motion, the court extended this deadline to March 12, 2010. In its instant motion, Defendant states that it did not receive Plaintiff’s expert report until March 17, 2010. (Plaintiff asserts that she submitted her expert Dockets.Justia.com report by facsimile transmission and overnight FedEx on March 16, 2010). While the court does not look favorably on a party failing to meet court-imposed deadlines, the court finds that, here, Defendant has not been prejudiced in receiving Plaintiff’s expert report merely two or three business days after the March 12, 2010 deadline. Accordingly; IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion to Strike the Testimony and Untimely Report of Plaintiff’s Proposed Expert, Don Kotter” (Doc. No. 17) be and is hereby DENIED. Nothing herein should be construed, however, as a comment by the court on the contents of Plaintiff’s expert report (a copy Defendant’s supporting memorandum). of which was attached to Further, Plaintiff’s counsel should not use this ruling as a precedent for failing to meet court-imposed deadlines in further practice before this court. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 7th day of April, 2010. ______________________________ A.J. McNAMARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
