In re: Dorothy Chase Stewart, No. 2:2008cv04805 - Document 6 (E.D. La. 2009)
Court Description: ORDER & REASONS that Wells Fargo's appeal is RENDERED MOOT. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 8/7/09.(plh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
In re: Dorothy Chase Stewart Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CIVIL ACTION DOROTHY CHASE STEWART NO. 08-3225 c/w 08-3669, 08-3852, 083853, 08-4805 [REF: 08-4805] SECTION "C" 4 ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Wells Fargo’s appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s October 14, 2008 order. (Civ. No. 08-4805, Rec. Doc. 1). Appellant claims that the October order by the Bankruptcy Court impermissibly affects matters currently on appeal, including an April 10, 2008 Order on related matters. As such, appellant argues that the Bankruptcy Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. This Court has now issued an opinion denying Wells Fargo’s appeal of the April 10, 2008 order. The Court’s resolution of the appeal did not take into account the subsequent opinion issued by the Bankruptcy Court in October 2008. Accordingly, Wells Fargo’s appeal (Civ. No. 08-4805, Rec. Doc. 1) is RENDERED MOOT. New Orleans, Louisiana this 7th day of August, 2009. HELEN G. BERRIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
