Powell v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, No. 2:2007cv00247 - Document 45 (E.D. La. 2008)
Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS denying 43 Request/Statement of Oral Argument filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 10/10/08.(blg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Powell v. Scottsdale Insurance Company Doc. 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DON DAHL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 07-247 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY SECTION "F" ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is the defendant’s request for oral argument on defendant’s Motion to Enforce Settlement. The request is DENIED for the following reasons. It is the Court’s policy to grant oral argument on motions if one of the following factors is present: 1. There is a need for an evidentiary hearing. 2. The motion or opposition papers involve a novel or complex issue of law that is unsettled. 3. The motion or opposition papers argue for a change in existing law. 4. The motion or opposition papers implicate a constitutional issue. 5. The case itself is of widespread community interest. Because the motion does not involve any of the above factors, 1 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED: that the request for oral argument on the motion to dismiss is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, October 10, 2008. ______________________________ MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
