Rome v. Guillory et al, No. 2:2006cv02089 - Document 48 (E.D. La. 2008)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying 41 MOTION for Reconsideration re 38 Memorandum & Opinion; MOTION for Reconsideration re 38 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Jerry Rome. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 11/4/08.(blg)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JERRY ROME CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 06-2089 TERRY GUILLORY, JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, AND DANIEL EDWARDS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF TANGIPAHOA PARISH SECTION K (1) ORDER AND OPINION Before the Court is the Motion for New Trial or Alternatively for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment on Behalf of Plaintiff, Jerry Rome (Doc. 41). Having reviewed the pleadings, memoranda, and relevant law, the Court, for the reasons assigned, DENIES the motion. In an Order and Opinion filed May 27, 2008, the Court denied plaintiff Jerry Rome s motion for summary judgment, granted the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendants Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff Daniel Edwards, Deputy Terry Guillory, Deputy Henry Neihausm and Deputy Dale Athman, and dismissed plaintiff s claims for damages for unlawful seizure and use of excessive force. Plaintiff now asks the Court to reconsider its decision with respect to the dismissal of his claim for unlawful seizure pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง1983. Before entering the Order and Opinion dismissing plaintiff s claims, the Court carefully reviewed plaintiff s contentions and the applicable law. The Court has now again carefully considered the contentions urged by plaintiff and does not find them persuasive. Plaintiff has not put forth any new facts in connection with this motion nor has he cited any Louisiana law not previously considered by th Court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for New Trial or Alternatively for Reconsideration of Summary Judgment on Behalf of Plaintiff, Jerry Rome is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 4th day of November, 2008. STANWOOD R. DUVAL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
