Breadfort v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 5:2010cv00042 - Document 14 (W.D. Ky. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendations; final decision of Commissioner affirmed and plaintiff's complaint dismissed with prejudice; final and appealable. Signed by Senior Judge Edward H. Johnstone on 10/01/2010. cc:counsel (CSD)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Breadfort v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10CV42-J ANTHONY BREADFORT PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Anthony Breadfort seeks Disability Insurance Benefits which were denied by the Commissioner. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge W. David King who recommends that the final decision of the Commissioner be affirmed and the plaintiff’s claim dismissed. The plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report, arguing: 1) the ALJ erred in failing to consider plaintiff’s disability rating by the Department of Veterans Affairs; 2) the ALJ erred in failing to find plaintiff suffers from severe mental impairments and in failing to properly consider the effects of plaintiff’s mental impairments on his ability to work; and 3) alternatively, the case should be remanded pursuant to sentence six for consideration of new evidence that arose since the denial of the claim. Thorough review of the record in light of the claimant’s arguments reveals that the ALJ’s conclusions are supported by substantial evidence of record. The issues in contention were sufficiently addressed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. In sum, this Court has conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation in light of the objections thereto and the record as a whole. The Magistrate Judge’s Report is hereby adopted, and its findings and conclusions are incorporated by reference herein. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and those findings and conclusions are incorporated by reference herein; 2) The final Decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is AFFIRMED; and 3) Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. This is a final and appealable Memorandum Opinion and Order, and there is no just cause for delay. October 1, 2010
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
