Smith v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc et al, No. 3:2015cv00560 - Document 45 (W.D. Ky. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 7/8/2016, GRANTING 40 Motion for Leave to file Third-Party Complaint. The Court ORDERS Defendants' tendered third-party complaint FILED in the record. cc: Counsel(RLK)

Download PDF
Smith v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc et al Doc. 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE AMY C. SMITH, as Personal Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of Nicholas A. Smith, Deceased v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-00560-CRS OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC., ET AL DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants move to file a third-party complaint against Davey Wright. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14, “A defending party may, as third-party plaintiff, serve a summons and complaint on a nonparty who is or may be liable to it for all or part of the claim against it.” Whether to grant leave to implead is within this Court’s discretion and “is essentially a process of balancing the prejudices.” Kindred Healthcare, Inc. v. Homeland Ins. Co. of New York, No. 3:15-CV-00433-CRS (W.D. Ky. Apr. 22, 2016) (internal citations and quotations omitted). For example, “[T]he timeliness of the motion is an urgent factor governing the exercise of such discretion.” Gen. Elec. Co. v. Irvin, 274 F.2d 175, 178 (6th Cir. 1960). Courts should freely grant timely motions. In re Yamaha Motor Corp. Rhino ATV Products Liab. Litig., No. 3:09-MD-2016-JBC (W.D. Ky. July 24, 2009). However, in balancing prejudices, some courts have taken into consideration whether granting the motion “would prejudice the plaintiff, unduly 1 Dockets.Justia.com complicate the trial, or would foster an obviously unmeritorious claim.” See, e.g., id. (internal citations and quotations omitted). Defendants timely move to implead Wright, whose negligence, according to Defendants, resulted in the vehicle collision at issue in the present matter. At this early point in litigation, the balance of prejudices weighs in favor of granting Defendants’ motion. Impleading Wright will not complicate issues for trial or prejudice Plaintiff, instead Wright’s presence avoids potentially duplicative litigation. The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for leave to file a third-party complaint against Davey Wright. (DN 40) The Court ORDERS Defendants’ tendered third-party complaint FILED in the record of this action. IT IS ORDERED. July 8, 2016 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.