Tate v. State of Tennessee et al, No. 1:2012cv00124 - Document 31 (W.D. Ky. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 12/20/12 Dismissing Case with prejudice because the plaintiff made no response to the Defendant's various motions to dismiss. cc:counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-000124-JHM JOHN DANIEL TATE PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on various motions to dismiss and on the Plaintiff s motion to withdraw [DN 29], which the Court will treat as a motion to voluntarily dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed. The action is dismissed with prejudice because the Plaintiff made no response to the Defendants various motions to dismiss. cc: counsel of record December 20, 2012
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
