Potter v. USA, No. 7:2013cv07290 - Document 2 (E.D. Ky. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Defendant/Movant Anthony T. Potter's motion to vacate the senten ce and conviction previously entered in Pikeville Criminal Action No. 7:03-21-DCR (Record No. 58 ) is DENIED and his claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice. 2. Judgment is entered favor of Respondent United States of America with respect to all issues raised herein. 3. This habeas proceeding is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from Court's docket. Signed by Judge Danny C. Reeves on 7/31/2013. (TDA) cc: COR & Anthony Potter

Download PDF

Potter v. USA Doc. 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION (at Pikeville) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, V. ANTHONY T. POTTER, Defendant/Movant. Civil Action No. 7: 13-7290-DCR JUDGMENT *** *** *** *** In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Defendant/Movant Anthony T. Potter’s motion to vacate the sentence and conviction previously entered in Pikeville Criminal Action No. 7: 03-21-DCR [Record No. 58] is DENIED and his claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice. 2. Judgment is entered favor of Respondent United States of America with respect to all issues raised herein. 3. This habeas proceeding is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court’s docket. This 31st day of July, 2013. -1- Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.