Alba v. Rivera et al, No. 7:2010cv00040 - Document 15 (E.D. Ky. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: (1) Judgment entered in favor of Dfs: (1) Delbert G. Sauers, BOP Designation and Sentence Computation Center; (2) Ayanna Brown, U.S. Department of Justice, Special Litigation Section, Civil Rights Division; (3) " L." Rivera, Case Manager, USP-Big Sandy; (4) "H." Chance, Unit Manager, USP-BigSandy; (5) H. A. Rios, Warden, USP-Big Sandy; (6) "J." Link, Special Investigative Administrator, USP-Big Sandy; and (7) "K." Williams, Special Investigative Supervisor, USP Big Sandy. (2) This is a FINAL Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. (3) The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. () This matter IS STRICKEN from Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Karl S. Forester on 11/2/2010. (TDA)cc: COR & Paul Alba, Jr.

Download PDF
Alba v. Rivera et al Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE PAUL ALBA, JR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, V. MR. L. RIVERA, et al., Defendants. ** ** ** Civil Action No. 7:10-CV-040-KSF JUDGMENT ** ** In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants: (1) Delbert G. Sauers, Bureau of Prisons Designation and Sentence Computation Center; (2) Ayanna Brown, U.S. Department of Justice, Special Litigation Section, Civil Rights Division; (3) “ L.” Rivera, Case Manager, United States Penitentiary-Big Sandy (“USP-Big Sandy”); (4) “H.” Chance, Unit Manager, USP-Big Sandy; (5) H. A. Rios, Warden, USP-Big Sandy; (6) “J.” Link, Special Investigative Administrator, USP-Big Sandy; and (7) “K.” Williams, Special Investigative Supervisor, USPBig Sandy. (2) This is a FINAL Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. (3) The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Dockets.Justia.com (4) This matter IS STRICKEN from the Court’s active docket. This November 2, 2010. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.