Osborn v. Griffin et al, No. 2:2011cv00089 - Document 1138 (E.D. Ky. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1) Def John M. Griffin's motion for an order discharging exempt individual retirement account from garnishment 1110 is GRANTED; and 2) Def John M. Griffin's expedited motion for order approving deposits 1064 is DENIED AS MOOT in light of the parties' Escrow Agreement 1125 . Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 8/2/2016.(ECO)cc: COR
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Osborn v. Griffin et al Doc. 1138 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT COVINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 2011-89 (WOB-CJS) ELIZABETH A. OSBORN PLAINTIFF VS. JOHN M. GRIFFIN, ET AL. DEFENDANTS and CIVIL ACTION NO. 2013-32 (WOB-CJS) LINDA G. HOLT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS VS. DENNIS B. GRIFFIN, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant John M. Griffin’s motion for an order discharging exempt individual retirement account from garnishment (Doc. 1110). The Court has reviewed this matter and finds defendant’s motion well demonstrates taken. that The the information account in provided question is by defendant exempt from garnishment pursuant to KRS 427.150(2)(f). Dockets.Justia.com Therefore, having reviewed this matter, and being otherwise advised, IT IS ORDERED that (1) defendant John M. Griffin’s motion for an order discharging exempt individual retirement account from garnishment (Doc. 1110) be, and is hereby, GRANTED; and (2) defendant John M. Griffin’s expedited motion for order approving deposits (Doc. 1064) be, and is hereby, DENIED AS MOOT in light of the parties’ Escrow Agreement (Doc. 1125). This 2nd day of August, 2016. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
