Afful v. Priddle et al, No. 2:2019cv02578 - Document 16 (D. Kan. 2019)
Court Description: AGREED PROTECVTIVE ORDER granting 15 joint motion for protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/4/2019. (amh)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS DORCAS AFFUL, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN A. PRIDDLE, M.D., DIANE F. WENDELKEN, A.P.R.N., REBEKA WEBER, M.D. and WOMEN’S HEALTH GROUP, P.A., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 19-2578-CM AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER The parties agree during the course of discovery it may be necessary to disclose certain confidential information relating to the subject matter of this action. They agree certain categories of such information should be treated as confidential, protected from disclosure outside this litigation, and used only for purposes of prosecuting or defending this action and any appeals. The parties jointly request entry of a protective order to limit the disclosure, dissemination, and use of certain identified categories of confidential information. The parties assert in support of their request that protection of the identified categories of confidential information is necessary because this matter involves a plaintiff whose medical records and personal information should be protected from public disclosure. This medical negligence action is brought by the plaintiff and relates to claimed injuries suffered during plaintiff’s labor and delivery process. (See ECF No. 1) Page 1 of 13 Because of the type of the claims being made and the nature of the alleged injuries, certain documents are relevant and discoverable, but should be maintained confidential in this litigation because of either their sensitive/personal nature and/or the need for proprietary business reasons. The matter also involves potential personal information and proprietary business information involving the defendants which should similarly be protected from public disclosure. For good cause shown under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), the court grants the parties’ Amended Agreed Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 15) and hereby enters the following Protective Order: 1. Scope. All documents and materials produced in the course of discovery of this case, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, all deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter, collectively, “documents”), are subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as set forth below. As there is a presumption in favor of open and public judicial proceedings in the federal courts, this Order will be strictly construed in favor of public disclosure and open proceedings wherever possible. 2. Definition of Confidential Information. As used in this Order, “Confidential Information” is defined as information that the producing party designates in good faith has been previously maintained in a confidential manner and should be protected from disclosure and use outside the litigation because its disclosure and use are restricted by statute or could potentially cause harm to the interests of the disclosing party or nonparties. For purposes of this Order, the parties will limit their designation of Page 2 of 13 “Confidential Information” to the following categories of information or documents: a) All medical records and bills of Dorcas Afful; b) All social security numbers, dates of birth, drivers’ license numbers, and contact information of the parties to this lawsuit; c) All insurance and social security records of the parties; d) All financial and/or tax records of the parties; e) All documents obtained by any party using an authorization provided by any other party; and f) All documents concerning any of the parties in any way relating to the topics/categories addressed in subsections a-e, above, obtained by any party via subpoena. g) All documents and photographs produced by any party in response to discovery requests and labeled as “Confidential”. Information or documents that are available to the public may not be designated as Confidential Information. 3. Form and Timing of Designation. The producing party may designate documents as containing Confidential Information and therefore subject to protection under this Order by marking or placing the words “CONFIDENTIAL - SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” (hereinafter, “the marking”) on the document and on all copies in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. As used in this Order, “copies” includes electronic images, duplicates, extracts, summaries, or descriptions Page 3 of 13 that contain the Confidential Information. The marking will be applied prior to or at the time the documents are produced or disclosed. Applying the marking to a document does not mean that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. Copies that are made of any designated documents must also bear the marking, except that indices, electronic databases, or lists of documents that do not contain substantial portions or images of the text of marked documents and do not otherwise disclose the substance of the Confidential Information are not required to be marked. By marking a designated document as confidential, the designating attorney thereby certifies that the document contains Confidential Information as defined in this Order. 4. Inadvertent Failure to Designate. Inadvertent failure to designate any document or material as containing Confidential Information will not constitute a waiver of an otherwise valid claim of confidentiality pursuant to this Order, so long as a claim of confidentiality is asserted within 10 days after discovery of the inadvertent failure. 5. Depositions. Deposition testimony will be deemed confidential only if designated as such when the deposition is taken or within a reasonable time after receipt of the deposition transcript. Such designation must be specific as to the portions of the transcript and/or any exhibits to be protected. 6. Protection of Confidential Material. (a) General Protections. Designated Confidential Information must be used or disclosed solely for purposes of prosecuting or defending this lawsuit, including Page 4 of 13 any appeals. (b) Who May View Designated Confidential Information. Except with the prior written consent of the designating party or prior order of the court, designated Confidential Information may only be disclosed to the following persons: 1) Parties in this case; 2) Counsel of Record and their paralegals and administrative staff; 3) The Court reporters, recorders, and videographers engaged for depositions; 4) The Court before which this case is pending, including necessary court personnel, courtroom technicians, and jury members; 5) Any mediator appointed by the court or jointly selected by the parties; 6) Representatives of the medical insurers of defendants; 7) Fact witnesses and prospective fact witnesses for depositions and trial in this case or for purposes of preparation therefore; 8) Expert consultants or witnesses who may be called at trial in this case; and 9) Any other designated person upon the prior written consent of all parties to this case, or upon Order or ruling of the Court. (c) Control of Documents. The parties must take reasonable efforts Page 5 of 13 to prevent unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of documents designated as containing Confidential Information pursuant to the terms of this Order. Other than persons listed in categories 6(b)1-5 above, any recipient to whom Confidential Information is disclosed shall, prior to disclosure, be required by the disclosing party to read this Order and certify in writing, in a form substantially similar to ATTACHMENT A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to be bound by its terms and conditions and to subject himself/herself to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purposes of enforcement proceedings if he/she violates this Order. Counsel for the parties disclosing the Confidential Information shall maintain these certificates and a list of each recipient to whom the information was disclosed. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive final termination of this case. 7. Filing of Confidential Information. If a party seeks to file any document containing Confidential Information subject to protection under this Order, that party must take appropriate action to ensure that the document receives proper protection from public disclosure, such as: (a) filing a redacted document with the consent of the party who designated the document as confidential; or (b) seeking permission to file the document under seal by filing a motion for leave to file under seal in accordance with D. Kan. Rule 5.4.6. Nothing in this Order will be construed as a prior directive to allow any document to be filed under seal. The mere designation of information as confidential pursuant to this Order is insufficient to satisfy the court’s requirements for filing under seal in light of the Page 6 of 13 public’s qualified right of access to court dockets. The parties understand that the requested documents may be filed under seal only with the permission of the court after proper motion. If the motion is granted and the requesting party permitted to file the requested documents under seal, only counsel of record and unrepresented parties will have access to the sealed documents. 8. Challenges to a Confidential Designation. The designation of any material or document as Confidential Information is subject to challenge by any party. Before filing any motion or objection to a confidential designation, though, the objecting party must meet and confer in good faith to resolve the objection informally without judicial intervention. A party that elects to challenge a confidentiality designation may file a motion that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge; the parties are strongly encouraged to consider arranging a telephone conference with the undersigned magistrate judge before filing such a motion, but such a conference is not mandatory. The burden of proving the necessity of a confidentiality designation remains with the party asserting confidentiality. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties must continue to treat the materials as Confidential Information under the terms of this Order. 9. Use of Confidential Documents or Information at Trial or Hearing. Nothing in this Order will be construed to affect the use of any document, material, or information at any trial or hearing. A party that intends to present or anticipates that another party may present Confidential Information at a hearing or trial must bring that Page 7 of 13 issue to the attention of the court and the other parties without disclosing the Confidential Information. The court may thereafter make such orders as are necessary to govern the use of such documents or information at the hearing or trial. 10. Obligations on Conclusion of Litigation. (a) Order Remains in Effect. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered, all provisions of this Order will remain in effect and continue to be binding after conclusion of the litigation. (b) Return of Confidential Documents. Within thirty (30) days after the final termination of this case, whether by settlement, judgment, or decision on appeal, all original documents and copies of document designated as “Confidential” and produced shall be destroyed or returned to counsel for the producing party unless: (1) the document has been offered into evidence or filed without restriction as to disclosure; (2) the parties agree to destruction of the document to the extent practicable in lieu of return; or (3) as to documents bearing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving party, that party elects to destroy the documents and certifies to the producing party that it has done so. (c) Retention of Work Product. Notwithstanding the above requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work product, including an index which refers or relates to designated Confidential Information, so long as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text or images of designated documents. This work product will continue to be confidential under this Page 8 of 13 Order. An attorney may use his or her own work product in subsequent litigation provided that its use does not disclose Confidential Information. 11. Order Subject to Modification. This Order is subject to modification by the court on its own motion or on motion of any party or any other person with standing concerning the subject matter. The Order must not, however, be modified until the parties have been given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the proposed modification. 12. Enforcement of Protective Order. Even after the final disposition of this case, a party or any other person with standing concerning the subject matter may file a motion to seek leave to reopen the case for the limited purpose of enforcing or modifying the provisions of this Order. 13. No Prior Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the representations and agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery. Nothing in this Order will be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any document or material designated as Confidential Information by counsel or the parties is entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) or otherwise until such time as the court may rule on a specific document or issue. 14. Persons Bound by Protective Order. This Order will take effect when entered and is binding upon all counsel of record and their law firms, the parties, and persons made subject to this Order by its terms. 15. Applicability to Parties Later Joined. If additional persons or entities become parties to this lawsuit, they must not be given access to any Confidential Page 9 of 13 Information until they execute and file their written agreement to be bound by the provisions of this Order. 16. Protections Extended to Third-Party’s Confidential Information. The parties agree to extend the provisions of this Protective Order to Confidential Information produced in this case by third parties, if timely requested by the third party. 17. Confidential Information Subpoenaed or Ordered Produced in Other Litigation. If a receiving party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that would compel disclosure of any material or document designated in this action as Confidential Information, the receiving party must so notify the designating party, in writing, immediately and in no event more than three business days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. The receiving party also must immediately inform in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Order, and deliver a copy of this Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the subpoena to issue. Page 10 of 13 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested persons to the existence of this Order and to afford the designating party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its Confidential Information in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The designating party bears the burden and the expense of seeking protection in that court of its Confidential Information, and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a receiving party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. The obligations set forth in this paragraph remain in effect while the party has in its possession, custody, or control Confidential Information designated by the other party to this case. 18. Disclosure of Confidential Information Covered by Attorney-Client Privilege or Work Product. Whether inadvertent or otherwise, the disclosure or production of any information or document that is subject to an objection on the basis of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, including, but not limited to, information or documents that may be considered Confidential Information under the Protective Order, will not be deemed to waive a party’s claim to its privileged or protected nature or estop that party or the privilege holder from designating the information or document as attorney-client privileged or subject to the work-product doctrine at a later date. Any party receiving any such information or document must return it upon request to the producing party. Upon receiving such a request as to specific information or documents, the receiving party must return the information or documents to the producing party within 10 days, regardless of whether the receiving party agrees with the claim of privilege and/or work-product protection. Disclosure of the information or document by Page 11 of 13 the other party prior to such later designation will not be deemed a violation of the provisions of this Order. Although the provisions of this section constitute an order pursuant to Rule 502(d) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and will be construed in a manner consistent with the maximum protection provided by said rule, nothing in this Order is intended or will be construed to limit a party’s right to conduct a review of documents, including electronically-stored information, for relevance, responsiveness, or segregation of privileged or protected information before production. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2019 s/ James P. O’Hara James P. O’Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge WE SO MOVE and agree to abide by the terms of this Order: SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN, CHARTERED /s/ David R. Morantz David R. Morantz, KS #22431 2600 Grand Boulevard, Suite 550 Kansas City, MO 64108 (816) 474-0004 / 474-0003 Facsimile dmorantz@sjblaw.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF LOGAN, LOGAN & WATSON, L.C /s/ Jeff K. Brown __ Jeff K. Brown, #17662 8340 Mission Road, Suite 106 Prairie Village, KS 66206 (913) 381-1121 / 381-6546 Facsimile jbrown@loganlaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS Page 12 of 13 ATTACHMENT A ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he/she has read the Protective Order dated _______________ in the case captioned, _________________________________, and attached hereto, understands the terms thereof, and agrees to be bound by its terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in matters relating to this Protective Order and understands that the terms of the Protective Order obligate him/her to use materials designated as Confidential Information in accordance with the order solely for the purposes of the above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such Confidential Information to any other person, firm, or concern, except in accordance with the provisions of the Protective Order. The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Protective Order may result in penalties for contempt of court. Name: ______________________________________ Job Title: ______________________________________ Employer: ______________________________________ Business Address: ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Date: _____________ ______________________________________ Signature Page 13 of 13
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
