THOMAS v. KROGER, No. 1:2013cv00588 - Document 33 (S.D. Ind. 2014)
Court Description: CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58: For the reasons detailed in the Court's Order entered this day, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action in favor of Defendant Kroger and against Plaintiff Vernon D. Thomas as to all claims asserted against Kroger, such that Mr. Thomas shall take nothing by way of this action. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/12/2014. (SWM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
THOMAS v. KROGER Doc. 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION VERNON D. THOMAS, Plaintiff, vs. KROGER, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:13-cv-00588-JMS-DML FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PRO. 58 For the reasons detailed in the Court’s Order entered this day, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in this action in favor of Defendant Kroger and against Plaintiff Vernon D. Thomas as to all claims asserted against Kroger, such that Mr. Thomas shall take nothing by way of this action. _______________________________ Dated: 02/12/2014 Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Laura A. Briggs, Clerk of Court By: _____________________________ Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com Distribution via United States Mail: VERNON D THOMAS 5713 W. Ray St. Apt A Indianapolis, IN 46241 Distribution via ECF: Jason Thomas Clagg BARNES & THORNBURG jason.clagg@btlaw.com Jennifer Rae Tudor BARNES & THORNBURG LLP jennifer.tudor@btlaw.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
