COLEMAN v. BUREAU OF INDIANA EDUCATION, No. 1:2012cv01005 - Document 5 (S.D. Ind. 2012)

Court Description: ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - Karey Coleman's complaint is incomplete to the point of being incomprehensible. It fails to state a claim having facial plausibility and thus fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The c omplaint is therefore dismissed. Final judgment shall not issue at this time. Instead, Coleman shall have through September 27, 2012, in which to file an amended complaint. If no amended complaint is filed as permitted in Part II of this Entry, the action will be dismissed consistent with the dismissal of the complaint in Part I. (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/12/2012. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail)(JKS)

Download PDF
COLEMAN v. BUREAU OF INDIANA EDUCATION Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA KAREY COLEMAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. BUREAU OF INDIANA EDUCATION, Defendant. No. 1:12-cv-1005-JMS-MJD Entry Directing Further Proceedings A A complaint must always . . . allege > enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.= Limestone Development Corp. v. Village of Lemont, Ill., 520 A F.3d 797, 803 (7th Cir. 2008) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). A A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). Karey Coleman’s complaint is incomplete to the point of being incomprehensible. It fails to state a claim having facial plausibility and thus fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The complaint is therefore dismissed. II. Final judgment shall not issue at this time. Instead, Coleman shall have through September 27, 2012, in which to file an amended complaint. The amended complaint, if filed, shall conform to the following guidelines: ! The amended complaint shall comply with the requirement of Rule 8(a)(2) that pleadings contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; Dockets.Justia.com ! The amended complaint shall comply with the requirement of Rule 10 that the allegations in a complaint be made in numbered paragraphs, each of which should recite, as far as practicable, only a single set of circumstances; and ! The amended complaint must identify what legal injury he claims to have suffered and what persons are responsible for each such legal injury. III. If no amended complaint is filed as permitted in Part II of this Entry, the action will be dismissed consistent with the dismissal of the complaint in Part I. If an amended complaint is filed as permitted in Part II of this Entry, the court will issue whatever further order is warranted. IT IS SO ORDERED. 09/12/2012 Date: __________________ Distribution: Karey Coleman 189 South Sunblest Blvd Fishers, IN 46038 _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.