CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NWJ INVESTMENT FUND IV, LLC et al., No. 1:2011cv00768 - Document 97 (S.D. Ind. 2013)
Court Description: CLOSED FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Third-Party pltf Chicago Title Ins Comp and against Third-Party deft Nickolas W. Jekogian III, in the amount of $343,301.39 in damages. All Claims against Third-Party deft NWJ Investment Fund IV, LLC have been dismissed without prej. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/7/2013.(CBU)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NWJ INVESTMENT FUND IV, LLC et al. Doc. 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. NWJ INVESTMENT FUND, IV, LLC, & NICKOLAS W. JEKOGIAN, III, Third-Party Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:11-cv-768-JMS-DKL FINAL JUDGMENT The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Third-Party Plaintiff Chicago Title Insurance Company and against Third-Party Defendant Nickolas W. Jekogian, III, in the amount of $343,301.39 in damages. All claims against Third-Party Defendant NWJ Investment Fund, IV, LLC, have been dismissed without prejudice. 06/07/2013 _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution via ECF only: James A.L. Buddenbaum PARR RICHEY OBREMSKEY FRANDSEN & PATTERSON LLP-Lebanon jbuddenbaum@parrlaw.com James E. Carlberg BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS, LLP jcarlberg@boselaw.com Shawna Meyer Eikenberry BAKER & DANIELS - Indianapolis shawna.eikenberry@FaegreBD.com Travis W. Montgomery -1- Dockets.Justia.com PARR RICHEY OBREMSKEY FRANDSEN & PATTERSON LLP tmontgomery@parrlaw.com Carl R. Pebworth BAKER & DANIELS - Indianapolis carl.pebworth@FaegreBD.com Michael L. Schultz PARR RICHEY OBREMSKEY FRANDSEN & PATTERSON LLP mschultz@parrlaw.com Charles T. Switzer FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP - Indianapolis charles.switzer@FaegreBD.com Mark A. Voigtmann BAKER & DANIELS - Indianapolis mark.voigtmann@FaegreBD.com -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
