PETTIFORD v. DAVIS et al

Filing 26

ORDER denying 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel (S.O.) cm. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/3/2011. (MAC)

Download PDF
PETTIFORD v. DAVIS et al Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA KEVIN PETTIFORD, Plaintiff, vs. JENNIFER (GARZA) DAVIS, DCCC Supervisor, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-1324-SEB-TAB Entry Discussing Motion to Appoint Counsel The plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [25] has been considered. The plaintiff asserts that he has been unsuccessful in recruiting representation on his own. Although the court concludes, based on the above filing, that the plaintiff has made a reasonable effort to secure representation, he should continue his own effort. The court proceeds to the second inquiry required in these circumstances. The court's task in this second inquiry is to analyze the plaintiff's abilities as related to "the tasks that normally attend litigation: evidence gathering, preparing and responding to motions and other court filings, and trial." Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the question is not whether an attorney would help the plaintiff's case, but whether, given the difficulty of the case, the plaintiff seems competent to litigate it himself. Id. at 653-655. At this point, and based on the plaintiff's comprehensible filings, his use of the court's processes, his familiarity with both the factual circumstances surrounding his claims and with the legal issues associated with those claims, the plaintiff is competent to litigate on his own. Based on the foregoing, therefore, the plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [25] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Date: 03/03/2011 Distribution: Michael Roy Morow, STEPHENSON MOROW & SEMLER mmorow@stephlaw.com KEVIN PETTIFORD 852730 Indianapolis Re-Entry Educational Facility 401 North Randolph Street Indianapolis, IN 46201 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?