MATHEWS v. BRONGER MASONRY, INC., No. 1:2009cv00478 - Document 119 (S.D. Ind. 2011)

Court Description: CLOSED JUDGMENT - Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on Plaintiffs claim for unpaid salary under Ind. Code § 22-2-5-2 in the amount of $676.92 plus reasonable attorneys fees related to that claim. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on all of the other claims asserted by Plaintiff in this action. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/18/2011.(CKM)

Download PDF
MATHEWS v. BRONGER MASONRY, INC. Doc. 119 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION Penny Mathews, Plaintiff, vs. Bronger Masonry, Inc., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-cv-478-SEB-DML JUDGMENT The Court, having previously granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on Plaintiff’s claim under the Indiana Wage Claims Statute, Ind. Code § 22-2-9-2, [Docket No. 95] and having issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Following Bench trial addressing all of the remaining issues in this cause, now enters final judgment as follows: 1. Final judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on Plaintiff’s claim for unpaid salary under Ind. Code § 22-2-5-2 in the amount of $676.92 plus reasonable attorneys’ fees related to that claim; and 2. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on all of the other claims asserted by Plaintiff in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 02/18/2011 Date:________________________ _______________________________ SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Dockets.Justia.com Copies to: Zachary Judson Eichel EINTERZ & EINTERZ zach@einterzlaw.com Michael L. Einterz Jr. EINTERZ & EINTERZ michael@einterzlaw.com Michael L. Einterz Sr. EINTERZ & EINTERZ einterzfirm@aol.com Ronald E. Weldy WELDY & ASSOCIATES weldy@weldylaw.com 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.