Secrest v. United States of America, No. 3:2006cv00297 - Document 5 (N.D. Ind. 2006)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion requesting permission to file a second or successive 28 USC 2255 petition, denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. This Court has no jurisdiction to address the issues raised by Mr Secrest. Mr Secrest must file them with the court of appeals. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 5/15/06. (smp) Modified on 5/16/2006 (smp).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Secrest v. United States of America Doc. 5 case 3:06-cv-00297-RLM document 5 filed 05/15/2006 page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JOSEPH R. SECREST, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-297 RM (Criminal Cause No. 3:98-CR-36(01)RM OPINION AND ORDER On May 8, Mr. Secrest filed various documents with the court requesting permission to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 petition. The court has no jurisdiction to address the issues raised by Mr. Secrest, and so the motions are DENIED [Doc. Nos. 94, 95, 96, & 97]. Mr. Secrest must file them with the court of appeals at the following address: Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Clerk 2722 Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60604. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: May 15, 2006 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. Chief Judge United States District Court cc: J. Secrest K. Hays Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
