Moore v. Kasper et al, No. 3:2004cv00788 - Document 29 (N.D. Ind. 2005)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER; GRANTING 26 Motion for change of status; GRANTING 27 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. DISCHARGING the plaintiff from the requirement in the 1/21/05 order that he make installment payments toward the filing fee; DIRECTING the clerk's office to close the financial ledger for this case. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller Jr on 6/9/05. (cc: financial) (jld)

Download PDF
Moore v. Kasper et al Doc. 29 case 3:04-cv-00788-RLM-CAN document 29 filed 06/09/2005 page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION THOMAS MOORE, Plaintiff vs. BARBARA KASPER, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:04-CV-788 RM OPINION AND ORDER When Thomas Moore filed this action, he was a prisoner confined at the Miami Correctional Facility. The court granted Mr. Moore leave to proceed without full prepayment of fees and costs. Granting a prisoner s request to proceed in forma pauperis means that the inmate must pay the full filing fee, but may benefit from procedures whereby he will be permitted to pay the fee in installments from his prison trust account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Mr. Moore has not yet paid the full filing fee in this action. Mr. Moore has now been released from custody and is no longer confined in any jail or penal facility. The Seventh Circuit has held that when a prisoner is released before paying the filing fee in full, he must pay any initial partial filing fee that is assessed, and any installment payments justified by the income to his prisoner trust account. Robbins v. Switzer, 104 F.3d 895, 897-898 (7th Cir. 1997). But after his release, Section 1915(b)(4) permits a former prisoner who has paid the initial partial filing fee assessed under Section 1915(b)(1) and any installment payments due under Section 1915(b)(2), to be excused from further payments on the filing fee if he is destitute. Id. at 898. Dockets.Justia.com case 3:04-cv-00788-RLM-CAN document 29 filed 06/09/2005 page 2 of 2 Mr. Moore has made all payments required under Section 1915(b)(1) and Section 1915(b)(2), and has filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis as a nonprisoner. Review of Mr. Moore s petition establishes that he is has not been employed since his release from custody and that he has no assets. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4), he is currently entitled to proceed without making further payments on the filing fee. Unsuccessful litigants are liable for fees and costs and must pay when they are able. Robbins v. Switzer, 104 F.3d at 898. So, if Mr. Moore prevails in this case, or he is ultimately unsuccessful but his financial situation has improved, he may still be required to make further payments toward fees and costs. For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS the plaintiff s motion for change of status (docket #26), GRANTS his motion to proceed in forma pauperis as a nonprisoner [docket #27], DISCHARGES the plaintiff from the requirement imposed by the order issued on January 21, 2005, that he make installment payments toward the filing fee, and DIRECTS the clerk s office to close the financial ledger for this case. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: June 9 , 2005 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.