Doxy v. Harrington, No. 1:2013cv06842 - Document 16 (N.D. Ill. 2013)
Court Description: SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 11/19/2013. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (srb,)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Doxy v. Harrington Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. RODRICK DOXY #R67836, Petitioner, v. RICK HARRINGTON, Warden, etc., Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 13 C 6842 SUPPLEMENT TO MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Counsel for respondent Warden Rick Harrington has inquired telephonically of this Court’s staff as to whether any further submission is needed to enable to this Court to address the subject of a certificate of appealability from its November 13, 2013 memorandum opinion and order (“Opinion”) that dismissed the Section 2254 petition that had been filed by Rodrick Doxy (“Doxy”). This Court appreciates that inquiry, which brought its attention to its inadvertent oversight in failing to comply with Section 2254 Rule 11 on that subject. As the Opinion should have made clear and as this supplement expressly confirms, this Court denies Doxy a certificate of appealability, a matter on which no further submission from either Doxy or the respondent Warden is needed. Again as the analysis in the Opinion indicates, Doxy has failed to present any issue or issues that satisfy the showing by 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2). Finally, Doxy is of course entitled to seek a certificate of appealability from the Court of Appeals under Fed. Dockets.Justia.com R. App. 22. ________________________________________ Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge Date: November 19, 2013 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
