-BGC Klutnick et al v. Klutnick, No. 3:2010cv03324 - Document 4 (C.D. Ill. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION (See Written Opinion): It is ordered that: 1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 3) is ACCEPTED by the Court. (2) Plaintiffs' Complaint (d/e 1) is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. (3) This case is CLOSED. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 6/21/2011. (VM, ilcd)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
E-FILED Tuesday, 21 June, 2011 03:30:24 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION ALBERT A. KLUTNICK and BARBARA J. KLUTNICK, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES J. KLUTNICK, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 10-CV-3324 ) ) ) ) OPINION A Report and Recommendation (d/e 3) was entered by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on June 3, 2011. More than fourteen (14) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted by the Court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation (d/e 3) is ACCEPTED by the Court. (2) Plaintiffs Complaint (d/e 1) is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. (3) This case is CLOSED. ENTERED: June 21, 2011. FOR THE COURT: s/ Sue E. Myerscough SUE E. MYERSCOUGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
