Guion v. Shoot The Moon, LLC, No. 2:2010cv00174 - Document 24 (D. Idaho 2010)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Quash for Insufficient Process. It is further ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service is appointed as process server for Plaintiff in this matter. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by cjm)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO JOSEPHINE GUION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SHOOT THE MOON, LLC DBA CHILI S ) RESTAURANT, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ___________________________________) Case No. CV-10-174-N-BLW MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Before the Court is a Motion to Quash for Insufficient Service of Process (Docket No. 10). The Court has reviewed the motion and supporting documentation. For the following reasons, the Court now enters the following order granting the motion, and ordering service by the United States Marshal. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Josephine Guion is proceeding in forma pauperis in a Title VII employment discrimination suit against her employer, Shoot the Moon LLC, d.b.a. Chili s Restaurant.. Plaintiff served a copy of the summons and complaint on Defendant on April 2, 2010. See Ex. A, Defendant s Affidavit of Counsel in Memorandum Decision & Order - 1 Support of Motion, (Docket No. 10). Defendant moves to quash Plaintiff s service as insufficient under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DISCUSSION A. Insufficient Service Where a defendant is an out of state corporation, such as Defendant here, service on Defendant is valid when it complies with the federal rules, the rules of the state where the district court sits, or the rules of the state where service is made. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h), 4(e)(1). In this case, the district court sits in Idaho, and service was made in Montana. The federal rules, consistent with those of Idaho and Montana, require that service be performed by someone who is not a party to the case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2); Idaho R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1); Mont. R. Civ. P. 4(D)(1)(a). Plaintiff here signed a proof of service form,1 indicating that she personally served Defendant. See Ex. A, Defendant s Affidavit of Counsel in Support of Motion, (Docket No. 10). Under any of the applicable service rules, Plaintiff s service is invalid. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2), Idaho R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), Mont. R. Civ. P. 4(D)(1)(a). The Court will therefore grant Defendant s motion to quash service 1 Plaintiff s proof of service form was attached to Defendant s Affidavit (Docket No. 10), but was not filed with the Court as required by Rule 4(l)(1). Memorandum Decision & Order - 2 as insufficient. B. Service for In Forma Pauperis Plaintiffs On April 15, 2010, the Court granted Plaintiff s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Order, (Docket No. 8). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), the Court is required to appoint a process server for a plaintiff authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3).2 The Court may appoint a United States marshal or deputy marshal for this purpose. Id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994), overruled on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-485 (1995). The Court will therefore direct the United States Marshal Service to serve process for Plaintiff in this matter. Because Defendant is a corporation, service should be rendered by personally serving a copy of the summons and the complaint on an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process for Defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B); Idaho R. Civ. P. 4(d)(4)(A); Mont. R. Civ. P. 4(D)(2)(e)(i). 2 The policy for appointing process servers for plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis is based on the assumption that plaintiff likely cannot afford to hire a process server if plaintiff cannot pay fees and costs associated with filing suit. Byrd v. Stone, 94 F.3d 217, 219 (6th Cir. 1996) Memorandum Decision & Order - 3 ORDER THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant s Motion (Docket No. 10) to Quash for Insufficient Process is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service is appointed as process server for Plaintiff in this matter. The U.S. Marshal shall serve Defendant by personally serving a copy of the summons and complaint on an officer or managing or general agent of Shoot the Moon, LLC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B), Idaho R. Civ. P. 4(d)(4)(A) and Mont. R. Civ. P. 4(D)(2)(e)(I). DATED: June 9, 2010 Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge Memorandum Decision & Order - 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.