Harman v. United States of America, No. 1:2012cv00220 - Document 14 (D. Idaho 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. This case shall be transferred to the District of Alaska. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (krb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO RALPH A. HARMAN, Case No. 1:12-cv-00220-BLW Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. INTRODUCTION The Court has before it Defendant s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (Dkt. 6). The Court has determined that oral argument will not aid the decisional process of the Court. Accordingly, the Court will decide the motion based upon the submitted briefs. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant the motion, and transfer the case to the District of Alaska. ANALYSIS The United States asks the Court to dismiss or transfer this case to the District of Alaska pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3). Harman s Complaint asserts a refund action under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) for recovery of federal tax penalties paid. For an individual, a civil action against the United States under 28 U.S.C. 1346(a) may be prosecuted only . . . in the judicial district where the plaintiff resides. 28 U.S.C. § 1402. According to his Complaint, Harman resides in the District of Alaska. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1 Venue may be proper elsewhere when the plaintiff is a corporation. 28 U.S.C. § 1402(a)(2). Harman suggests venue is proper under Section 1402(a)(2) because his tax liabilities were created by the business operations of the Ralph A. Harman Family Limited Partnership. That makes no difference. Harman is the taxpayer against whom the tax penalties were assessed. Thus, only he has standing to bring a refund action for the recovery of those tax penalties. First American Title Ins. Co. v. United States, 520 F.3d 1051, 1053-54 (9th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, venue is only proper in the District of Alaska Although the United States filed a motion to dismiss, the United States indicated in its reply brief that it is not opposed to transfer instead of dismissal. The Court agrees that transfer is the better option. Accordingly, the Court will grant the motion and transfer the case to the District of Alaska. ORDER IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (Dkt. 6) is GRANTED. This case shall be transferred to the District of Alaska. 2. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference scheduled for November 28, 2012 is VACATED. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 2 DATED: November 15, 2012 _________________________ B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.