Fleming v. Escort Inc. et al, No. 1:2009cv00105 - Document 248 (D. Idaho 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER amending 237 Pre-Trial Order. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO HOYT A. FLEMING, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:09-CV-105-BLW v. ESCORT, INC. and BELTRONICS USA, INC., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Defendants. The parties held a telephone conference with the Court s Law Clerk, and requested two points of clarification which were submitted to me for review. I discuss those issues below. Demonstrative Exhibits The parties request clarification regarding the deadline for submitting demonstrative exhibits. In the order setting trial, I set a deadline for the exchange of all trial exhibits and all exhibit lists by May 7, 2012. See Order Setting Trial (Dkt. No. 172) at p. 2. I did not intend for that deadline to include the exchange of demonstrative exhibits. Later, in its Pretrial Order, I directed counsel to provide a list of witness and the demonstrative exhibits they will use 36 hours in advance of their testimony. See Pretrial Order (Dkt. No. 237). That was the deadline I intended for demonstrative exhibits. Thus, I will not exclude demonstrative exhibits that were not exchanged on May 7, 2012. Memorandum Decision & Order - 1 Escort makes a persuasive argument that if a witness is going to use an involved demonstrative exhibit like an animation or complex chart the 36-hour rule gives very little time to develop any response. Fleming agrees and suggest increasing the time. I agree and will direct counsel to provide demonstratives by no later than 5:00 p.m. three business days before their intended use. For example, a party expecting to use a demonstrative with a witness on a Thursday morning at 8:30 a.m. must have provided that demonstrative to opposing counsel the previous Monday by 5:00 p.m. And a party expecting to use a demonstrative with a witness on a Monday morning must have provided that demonstrative to opposing counsel the previous Wednesday by 5:00 p.m. Exhibit Objections In its Pretrial Order, I required that [a]t least one week before trial, counsel will provide the Court with (1) a list of trial exhibits which have not been agreed upon, (2) the basis for the objection, and (3) the response to those objections. Id. at p. 1. Fleming requests that the Court order the parties to exchange a list of all objections they have to their opponent s exhibits before holding a conference on the trial exhibits. While this advance knowledge would be helpful, the lists will likely be a mere repetitive listing of technical objections. The better course may be that suggested by Escort s counsel, involving a horse-trading session where objections are bartered for concessions. Ultimately, Escort s counsel recommended that I not direct the parties but simply hold to the original deadline set in the Pretrial Order, however that is accomplished. I agree. ORDER Memorandum Decision & Order - 2 In accordance with the Memorandum Decision set forth above, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Pretrial Order (docket no. 237) is AMENDED, so that a party is required to provide a list of the demonstrative exhibits they intend to use at trial to the opposing party by 5:00 p.m. three business days in advance of the time they intend to use those demonstrative exhibits at trial. DATED: June 4, 2012 Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Chief U. S. District Judge Memorandum Decision & Order - 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.