-BMK Department of Education, State of Hawaii v. F. et al, No. 1:2010cv00258 - Document 56 (D. Haw. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 55 . Signed by JUDGE A. WALLACE TASHIMA on 9/19/2011. ~...pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Magistrate Judge's "Findings and Recommendatio n that the Administrative Hearings Officers Decision Be Reversed and the Case Be Remanded to the Administrative Hearings Officer" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Participants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-BMK Department of Education, State of Hawaii v. F. et al Doc. 56 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ) STATE OF HAWAII, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) T.F., by and through his Mother, ) PAULINE F., ) ) Defendant(s). ) _____________________________ _ CV 10-00258 AWT-BMK ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The Magaistrate Judge’s “Findings and Recommendation that the Administrative Hearings Officer’s Decision Be Reversed and the Case Be Remanded to the Administrative Hearings Officer” having been filed and served on all parties on August 31, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party, Due for Adoption: 9/14/2011 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: this 19th day of Sepember, 2011 /s/ A. Wallace Tashima A. WALLACE TASHIMA United States Circuit Judge Sitting by designation cc:all parties of record Due for Adoption: 9/14/2011 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
