Fulgencio v. Wells et al, No. 3:2012cv00039 - Document 20 (S.D. Ga. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, respondents Eichenlaub and Lappin are dismissed, the 2241 petition is denied, this civil action is closed and a final judgment shall be entered in favor of respondent Wells. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 7/10/13. (cmr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Fulgencio v. Wells et al Doc. 20 N IGIN R AL IN THE IINITED STATESDISTRICTCOURT DISTRICTOF GEORGIA FORTHE SOUTHERN DUBLINDIVISION FILED i.r.5. DisTRrcT couRT iri"jGUSTA DlV. ?013 l0 Al{ | 3 JUill: at Fpx )u. ut5 RAFAEL FLILGENCIO. Petitioner, cv lt2-039 WALT WELLS, Warden, McRae,et al., CI Respondents. ORDER After a careful, de novo revrew of the file, the Court concurswith the Magistrate to Judge'sReport and Recommendation, which objectionshave been filed (doc. no. 19).' ofthe MagistrateJudgeis ADOPTED asthe Accordingly, the ReportandRecommendation opinionofthe Court. Therefore,Respondents EichenlaubandLappin areDISMISSED fiom this action,the instant$ 2241petitionis DENIED, this civil actionis CLOSED, anda final j udgmentshall be ENTERED in favor of Respondent Wells. UNTTED ST rAlthough Petitionerarguesin his objectionsthat the Court erredby addressing the wrong period of time for which he wishesto be creditedon his remainingsentence (doc.no. 19, p. I ), the supposedly "correct" time period rvasclearly encompassed the time periods by addressed the Report and Recommendation(see senerally doc. no. 17). Petitioner's in argument therefore presents no groLrndsfor deviation from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is OVERRULED. Dockets.Justia.co
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
