Etienne v. Precision Landscape Management, Incorporated et al, No. 6:2009cv00838 - Document 30 (M.D. Fla. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re joint settlement conference held on June 16, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding. The parties shall have 60 days to finalize their settlement and present a stipulated form of final judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this file. Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 7/6/2010. (LAM)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Etienne v. Precision Landscape Management, Incorporated et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JEAN CLAUDE ETIENNE, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 6:09-cv-838-Orl-31KRS PRECISION LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED and DAVID M. TUCCIO, Defendants. ______________________________________ ORDER This cause comes before the Court on a settlement reached during a settlement conference held before United States Magistrate Judge Karla R. Spaulding on June 16, 2010. On June 16, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 29) finding that the settlement reached is a fair resolution of a bona fide dispute under Lynn’s Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982). It is further recommended that the Clerk of Court administratively close the case subject to the right of any party to re-open the action within sixty (60) days, upon good cause shown, or to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this file. Order. Dockets.Justia.com 3. The parties shall have 60 days to finalize their settlement and present a stipulated form of final judgment. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on the 6th day of July, 2010. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
