Gotta v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 6:2007cv00656 - Document 22 (M.D. Fla. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER granting 20 Motion to affirm secretary's/commissioner's decision; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 21 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Christopher H. Gotta. After entry of judgment, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 10/15/2010. (DJD)

Download PDF
Gotta v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CHRISTOPHER H. GOTTA, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 6:07-cv-656-Orl-28KRS COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ______________________________________ ORDER This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Affirm the Commissioner’s Decision Subsequent to Remand for Entry of Judgment (Doc. No. 20) filed September 7, 2010. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted. After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Report and Recommendation filed September 22, 2010 (Doc. No. 21) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Affirm the Commissioner’s Decision Subsequent to Remand for Entry of Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED. 3. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. Dockets.Justia.com 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Christopher H. Gotta. 5. After entry of judgment, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida this _15th___ day of October, 2010. Copies furnished to: United States Magistrate Judge Counsel of Record Unrepresented Party -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.