Ghantous v. U-Pull and Save, LLC. et al, No. 2:2009cv00364 - Document 17 (M.D. Fla. 2009)
Court Description: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 16 Joint MOTION to Approve Settlement As Stipulated Final Judgment filed by Richard Ghantous. It is respectfully recommended the Joint Notice of Filing and Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement As St ipulated Final Judgment 16 should be GRANTED and the settlement agreement should be APPROVED by the District Court. It is further respectfully recommended the case should be DISMISSED with Prejudice pursuant to the agreement of the Parties and the Clerk should be directed to close the file Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/17/2009. (LMH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ghantous v. U-Pull and Save, LLC. et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION RICHARD GHANTOUS on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 2:09-cv-364-FtM-29SPC U-PULL AND SAVE, LLC a Florida limited liability company; CHESTER ADAMSON individually, Defendants. ______________________________________ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Notice of Filing and Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement As Stipulated Final Judgment (Doc. #16) filed on November 13, 2009. In an Order (Doc. #15) dated September 16, 2008, this Court ordered the parties to file an amended Joint Report Regarding Settlement that included the copy of the settlement agreement signed by all parties and a copy of the Plaintiffs Counsel’s billing records. The parties filed the instant Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement (Doc. #16) on November 13, 2009. The issue is now ripe for review. This case was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq. The Parties have reached a settlement agreement and seek court approval of that agreement. In Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-1355 (11th Cir. 1982), the Eleventh Circuit explained that claims for back wages under the FLSA may only be settled or compromised Dockets.Justia.com when the Department of Labor supervises the payment of back wages or when the district court enters a stipulated judgment “after scrutinizing the settlement for fairness.” In the Joint Motion for Approval submitted by the Parties, (Doc. # 16), the Parties represent that to avoid the expense and inconvenience of litigation, a settlement has been reached in a bona fide good faith dispute and is deemed fair and reasonable. The compromise of the original claim reached between the parties including attorney’s fees and costs is to be distributed as outlined below. The parties have agreed to a settlement amount of $6,000.00 and agree that this amount fairly and adequately compensates the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff, Richard Ghantous, is to receive $1,250.00 in unpaid overtime wages and $1,250.00 in liquidated damages, as a fair and reasonable settlement of his claim. The total amount received by the Plaintiff is $2,500.00. The parties further agreed that the Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys fees and costs to be paid to Plaintiff’s Counsel is in the amount of $3,500.00. Pursuant to the agreement between the parties, the Court respectfully recommends that the Plaintiff’s Counsel’s fees and costs are reasonable. Accordingly, it is now RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED: The Joint Notice of Filing and Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement As Stipulated Final Judgment (Doc. #16) should be GRANTED and the settlement agreement should be APPROVED by the District Court. It is further respectfully recommended the case should be DISMISSED with Prejudice pursuant to the agreement of the Parties and the Clerk should be directed to close the file. -2- Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within ten (10) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal. Respectfully recommended at Fort Myers, Florida, this 17th Copies: All Parties of Record -3- day of November, 2009.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
