GRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, No. 1:2017cv01750 - Document 6 (D.D.C. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court will DISMISS this action and direct the Clerk of Court to terminate this case. See document for details. A separate Order 7 will issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff at his address of record. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/30/2017. (lcrdm2, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS Doc. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GLEN GARY GRAY, III, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-1750 (RDM) v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Federal inmate Glen Gray, proceeding pro se, brought this action against the Federal Bureau of Prisons. In an earlier Order, the Court concluded that Gray’s complaint “d[id] not allege any facts that would allow the Court to discern the substance of Gray’s claims or to determine whether, if true, his allegations would entitle him to relief,” and thus failed to comply with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 5 at 2 (citing Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016)). The Court sua sponte dismissed Gray’s complaint without prejudice and granted him leave to file an amended complaint that complied with the dictates of Rule 8 and 12(b)(6). Id. Gray’s amended complaint was due on or before November 15, 2017. Id. More than two weeks have elapsed since that deadline, and the Court has received neither a response to its previous Order nor an amended pleading. It appears that Gray no longer intends to prosecute his case. Accordingly, Dockets.Justia.com the Court will dismiss this action and direct the Clerk of Court to terminate this case. A separate order will issue. /s/ Randolph D. Moss RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge Date: November 30, 2017 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
