HERRERA et al v. CRIMINAL CHAMBER OF SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF COLOMBIA, No. 1:2017cv00454 - Document 9 (D.D.C. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on May 30, 2017. (lcrbw2)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
HERRERA et al v. CRIMINAL CHAMBER OF SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE OF COLOMBIA Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) CESAR AUGUSTO TAMAYO HERRERA ) on behalf of EDINSON PERLAZA OROBIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-454 (RBW) ) CRIMINAL CHAMBER OF SUPREME ) COURT OF JUSTICE OF COLOMBIA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on the pro se plaintiff’s Complaint and his request for leave to add the names of the nine members of the Criminal Chamber of Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia to his Complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies the plaintiff’s leave to file request and dismisses his Complaint. It appears that the plaintiff predicates his Complaint on the proposition that there currently “does not exist in force an extradition treaty between the United States and Colombia.” Complaint (“Compl.”) at 2. Trial courts have the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”). Having reviewed the plaintiff’s Complaint carefully, the Court concludes that while difficult to assess, to the extent that factual contentions are identifiable, they are baseless and wholly incredible. Moreover, the plaintiff does not proffer any recognizable causes of actions, let alone any causes Dockets.Justia.com of actions that are justiciable. See generally Compl. Neither does the plaintiff present any basis for why he has standing either personally or via third party that would allow him to pursue claims on behalf of Edinson Perlaza Orobio regarding the validity of the extradition treaty between the United States and Colombia. See id. Finally, the plaintiff does not allege or identify any forms of relief he seeks from the Court. See id. Accordingly, the Court will deny the plaintiff’s request for leave to file the names of the nine members of the Criminal Chamber of Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia as defendants in this matter. The Court will also dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. SO ORDERED this 30th day of May, 2017. 1 REGGIE B. WALTON United States District Judge 1 An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
