TIPPENS v. COMMONWEALTH OF LOCALITY IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, No. 1:2012cv01007 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 6/18/2012. (ls, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA fiLED JUN 2 0 2012 us · o·tstnct &B . courts' tor the Oist . ankruptcy · Clerk Robert E. Tippens, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Commonwealth of Locality in their individual capacity, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) net ot Columbia Civil Action No. 12 1007 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a determination that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted). Plaintiff is a Virginia state prisoner incarcerated at the Powhatan Correctional Center in Virginia who appears to be suing the Commonwealth of Virginia over his conviction. Plaintiff contends, inter alia, that "attempted unlawful wounding is a void judgment and improper sentence," Compl. at 2, and he seeks $100,000 in damages "due to defendants' fraud, void judgment and an extended prison term for a crime that does not exist[.]" !d. at 3. Because the success of plaintiff's claim would necessarily void his conviction, plaintiff cannot recover monetary damages without first showing that he has invalidated the conviction by "revers[ al] on direct appeal, expunge[ ment] by executive order, declar[ ation of invalidity] by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or ... a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus." Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). Plaintiff has not shown the I { 3 invalidation of his conviction and, thus, has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. iii£ ~ (S H(h{ L United States District Judge Date: June /C(, 2012 1 Plaintiff cannot otherwise challenge his conviction in this Court because federal court review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(l). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court .. . may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [the applicant] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. § 224l(d). 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
