MCKINZIE v. DOUBLE TREE SUITES et al, No. 1:2012cv00991 - Document 4 (D.D.C. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 6/12/2012. (ls, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Melinda McKinzie, Plainti~f, v. Double Tree Suites (WDC) eta!., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUN 1 9 2012 Clerk, us o; t . Courts to.r the ;;~fr~c~ ~fnckr uptcy o umb1a 1 Civil Action No. 12 0991 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs prose complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing Double Tree Suites located in the District, its purported parent company in Florida, and a list of other defendants located in the District and Palm Beach, Florida. Plaintiff sues defendants for injuries she allegedly suffered as a result of their "negligent, wrongful, false and malicious acts" on May 18, 2009, Compl.~ 2, and I ~ ( she demands $1.5 million in damages. !d. ~ 1. The complaint presents neither a federal question -----~--------------------·-·---·-·----~··--·-·--------· nor a basis for diversity jurisdiction because plaintiff and some of the defendants reside in the District. See Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) ("For jurisdiction to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the plaintiff may not be a citizen of the same state as any defendant.") (citations omitted). 1 A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. Date: June / 1 ~12 United States District Judge Plaintiffs recourse may lie, if at all, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
