OBAMA-CARTER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al, No. 1:2011cv00783 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Reggie B. Walton on 4/20/2011. (ls, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Audrey Obama-Carter, Plaintiff, v. United States, et aI., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED APR 2 5 2011 Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the DIstrict of ColumbIa Civil Action No. 11 0783 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed in Jorma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint upon a determination that it, among other grounds, is frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The plaintiff sues a host of political figures and celebrities. See Complaint ("CompI.") Caption. Her accusations of rape, blackmail and extortion allegedly after she married President Barack Obama, see Compi. at I, and allegations that, inter alia, Oprah Winfrey willed her "3/4 of her estate but commited [sic] crimes on me and the State of New Jersey ... made her give me her entire estate .... , id. at 2, and Donald Trump "did not allow [her], Audrey Carter and President Obama to live together .... ," id., are the type of fantastic or delusional scenarios warranting dismissal under § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). ) Date: April I /~ W ,2011 ) A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
