JENNINGS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al, No. 1:2011cv00411 - Document 34 (D.D.C. 2011)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 33 Civil Statement from Troy Jennings. Signed by Judge Beryl A. Howell on 11/3/2011. (DJMAC, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TROY JENNINGS, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 11-411 (BAH) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court dismissed this case after the Plaintiff failed to oppose in a timely manner the Defendants dispositive motion despite having been warned by the Court that failure to do so could result in the motion being granted as conceded. Mem. Op., ECF No. 26; Order, ECF No. 27. The Plaintiff later moved for reconsideration of that dismissal. See Reconsideration Mot., ECF No. 28 [hereinafter Mot.]. The Court denied that motion because the Plaintiff had an opportunity to respond to the Defendants dispositive motion but had neither availed himself of that opportunity nor moved for an extension of time within which to file his response. Mem. Op. and Order, ECF No. 32. The Plaintiff has since filed two documents at ECF No. 33, both of which offer further support to an assertion the Plaintiff made in a previously filed supplement to his motion for reconsideration: that he was unable to respond to the Defendants dispositive motion in part because he was placed in administrative segregation on July 5, 2011. The Court already considered that assertion when it denied the Plaintiff s motion for reconsideration. Mem. Op. and Order at 3. The newly filed documents therefore provide no additional reason why the Court should reconsider its dismissal of this case. Accordingly, to the extent that the Plaintiff again seeks reconsideration of the dismissal of this case based on the new documents he recently filed at ECF No. 33, it is hereby ORDERED that such reconsideration DENIED. SO ORDERED this 3rd day of November, 2011. Beryl A. Howell /s/ BERYL A. HOWELL United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.