DUBOIS v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK et al, No. 1:2009cv02176 - Document 48 (D.D.C. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, For reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 2nd day of September, 2010, hereby ORDERED that Finestein & Malloy, L.L.C.'s Motion To Dismiss 7 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Chase Hom e Finance, LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Tait O. Norton's Motion To Dismiss 12 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Federal Natonal Mortgage Association's Motion To Dismiss 20 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Feder al Deposit Insurance Corporation-Corporate's Motion to Dismiss 22 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-Receiver's Motion To Dismiss 24 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 9/2/10. (see final judgment) (kc)

Download PDF
DUBOIS v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK et al Doc. 48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICHOLAS J. DUBOIS, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, in receivership, et al., Defendants. Civil Case No. 09-2176 (RJL) ) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 'tJ. 2- day of September, 2010, hereby ORDERED that Finestein & Malloy, L.L.C.'s Motion To Dismiss [#7] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Chase Home Finance, LLC, lP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Tait O. Norton's Motion To Dismiss [#12] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Federal National Mortgage Association's Motion To Dismiss [#20] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-Corporate's Motion To Dismiss [#22] is GRANTED; and it is further Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-Receiver's Motion To Dismiss [#24] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. \ 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.