HICKMAN v. THE PENTAGON OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 1:2009cv00974 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 5/15/09. (ls, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
FILED MAy 2 6 2DD9 e';rk, u.s. District and ankruptcy Courts UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Derian Douglas Hickman, Plaintiff, v. Pentagon of the United States of America, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09 0974 MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint. Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states the minimum requirements for complaints. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Rule 8(a) requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which federal jurisdiction rests, a short and plain statement showing that the plaintiff is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief sought. The minimum requirements Rule 8 imposes are designed to provide defendants with sufficient notice of the claim or claims being asserted in order to allow defendants to prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense, and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Compliance with Rule 8(a)'s requirements should also provide a court with sufficient information to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the claims. As drafted, the only named defendant is a building, which is not an entity that may be sued in its own name. Beyond that, the complaint does not make clear what claims plaintiff is 3 pursuing against which intended defendants on what grounds, and it does not provide sufficient notice to the defendants of the claims so that they may prepare a proper defense. The complaint also does not provide sufficient information to determine that jurisdiction exists to hear any of the claims plaintiff intends. Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 8. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. Date: J~ ~AJ~4~ !Mtt 2JJdj -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
