HENDERSON v. ESTRADA, No. 1:2009cv00339 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2009)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 2/10/09. (ls, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED FEB 2 a2009 NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT' DAVID HENDERSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. CHRIS ESTRADA, U.S. Postal Inspector, 09 U339 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and will dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Estrada conspired with others to interfere with, delay or destroy plaintiff s mail. See Compl. at 1-2. This interference with the mail "is part of a massive conspiracy [a]rising from plaintiffs work as an intelligence officer with the U.S. State Department ... and service in a military reserve unit." Id. at 2. He demands $100 million plus punitive damages. Id. The elements of civil conspiracy are "(1) an agreement between two or more persons; (2) to participate in an unlawful act, or a lawful act in an unlawful manner; (3) an injury caused by an unlawful overt act performed by one of the parties to the agreement; (4) which overt act was done pursuant to and in furtherance of the common scheme." Halberstam v. Welch, 705 F.2d 472,477 (D.C. Cir. 1983). Conclusory allegations of an agreement will not suffice. Brady v. Livingood, 360 F. Supp. 2d 94, 104 (D.D.C. 2004) (mere allegation that defendants "agreed among themselves" to subject plaintiff to discriminatory acts, without alleging facts suggesting that the defendants were acting in concert in furtherance of a shared goal of discriminating against him not sufficient) (footnote and citations omitted). Because plaintiff has not alleged facts to support his conspiracy claim, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately on this same date. ['./[u,- cJ }jude United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
