PETTIES, et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al, No. 1:1995cv00148 - Document 2030 (D.D.C. 2012)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 2003 joint motion of the parties to vacate the payment orders. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on October 4, 2012. (MA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NIKITA PETTIES, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 95-0148 (PLF) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion to vacate the payment orders listed below relating to payments to private providers of special education and related services. The parties have requested that the Court vacate these service payment orders in order to enable the District to implement its final rules governing the vendor payment and dispute process related to special education services paid for by the District of Columbia. After careful review of the Motion and in recognition of publication of final rules governing the payment and dispute process on June 22, 2012, the parties representations that the District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings is ready, willing and able to begin administering by November 1, 2012, the vendor payment disputes consistent with these rules, and the record applicable to this motion, it is ORDERED that the Joint Motion of the Parties is GRANTED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the following payment orders shall be vacated as of November 1, 2012, such that resolution of these disputes shall governed by the regulations issued by the Office of the State Superintendent of Education: 1. Order Modifying Payment Schedule for May through August 1996 and Implementing an Automated Payment System, March 27, 1996 (Doc. 182) 2. Order Modifying Automated Payment System, August 28, 1996 (Doc. 252) 3. Order Supplementing August 28, 1996 Order Modifying Automated Payment System , August 25, 1997 (Doc. 395) 4. Order Supplementing August 25, 1997 Order Modifying Automated Payment System (Setting Payment Schedule for 1998-99 School Year and Summer 1999), September 1, 1998 (Doc. 473) 5. Order Supplementing September 1, 1998 Order Modifying Automated Payment System (Setting Payment Schedule for 1999-2000 School Year and Summer 2000), September 24, 1999 (Doc. 648) 6. Order Supplementing September 24, 1999 Order Modifying Automated Payment System (Setting Payment Schedule for 2000-2001 School Year and Summer 2001), October 17, 2000 (Doc. 754) 7. Order Supplementing October 17, 2000 Order Modifying Automated Payment System (Setting Payment Schedule for 2001-02 School Year and Summer 2002), August 2, 2001 (Doc. 821) 8. Order Supplementing August 2, 2001 Order Modifying Automated Payment System (Setting Payment Schedule for September 2002), September 5, 2002 (Doc. 951) 9. Order Modifying and Supplementing August 25, 1997 Order Regarding Payment System (Setting Payment Schedule for 2002-03 School Year and Summer 2003), October 11, 2002 (Doc. 970) 10. Order Extending the Payment Order of October 11, 2002, August 25, 2003 (Doc. 1139) 11. Order Regarding Payment for Services to Class Members, November 8, 2004 (Doc. 1241) 12. Order Regarding Payment for Services to Class Members, August 5, 2009 (Doc. 1676); and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Special Master and (to the extent necessary) the 2 Court shall retain authority to address resolution of the following disputes: 1. Interdynamics, Inc. 2. Diagnostic Consultants, LLC 3. Progressus Therapy, LLC 4. Steppingstones Management Services, LLC 5. Joyce Thomas Children s Services, LLC 6. Elizabeth Messer Sims Children s Services, LLC 7. Just-A-Mite, Inc. 8. Independence and Dependence, LLC 9. Seeds of Tomorrow, Inc. 10. Ms. Vivian Cavalieri This Order shall not be construed to modify, replace or supersede any prior order of the Court in this matter, or any portion thereof, except as specifically set forth herein. SO ORDERED. /s/_______________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Court DATE: October 4, 2012 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
