Voss v. Silverman/Borenstein, PLLC, et al, No. 1:2013cv01094 - Document 8 (D. Colo. 2013)

Court Description: Final JUDGMENT. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Silverman /Borenstein, P.L.L.C.; Irvin Borenstein, Esquire; David Silverman, Esquire; And, Anne-Marie Vos, Esquire, and against Plaintiff, Beverly J. Voss, on Plaintif fs claims. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint and this civil action are dismissed with prejudice. While costs shall be awarded to the prevailing party (D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1) costs are not awarded in this instance as the defendants the prevailing parties were not served by Clerk on 12/20/13. (jjhsl, )

Download PDF
Voss v. Silverman/Borenstein, PLLC, et al Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-01094-WYD-CBS BEVERLY J. VOSS, Plaintiff, v. SILVERMAN/BORENSTEIN, PLLC; IRVIN BORENSTEIN, ESQUIRE; DAVID SILVERMAN, ESQUIRE; and, ANNE-MARIE VOS, ESQUIRE, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed on December 20, 2013, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Shaffer’s Recommendation [ECF Doc. No. 6] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Silverman / Borenstein, P.L.L.C.; Irvin Borenstein, Esquire; David Silverman, Esquire; And, Anne-Marie Vos, Esquire, and against Plaintiff, Beverly J. Voss, on Plaintiff’s claims. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint and this civil action are dismissed with prejudice. While costs shall be awarded to the prevailing party (D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1) costs are not awarded in this instance as the defendants – the prevailing parties – were not served. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 20th day of December, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.